You are viewing the archives of the old northcoastoregon.com. Please visit the new North Coast Oregon at: http://www.northcoastoregon.com/
A certain radio network chooses to taint its current success as our voice during the past hurricane, now chooses to sell-out to a negative and hostile corporation to aid them in erasing their non- effort during the storm when we needed every bit we could get by supporting, at best, a shallow effort in damage control to award an hourly wish to whom someone in that same campaign may deem a deserving candidate?
Amazing the power of money isn’t it?
And was it Joseph Pulitzer who said(Paraphrasing) and I guess it could apply to radio as well: “Establish you maximum circulation and then use that circulation to your best advantage to influence whatever events you deem most prosperous and advantageous.”?
2 On Dec 20, 03:51 pm, Anotherastorian wrote:
You are seriously disturbed McGee. How could you possibly consider their trying to make some people’s Christmas’ just a little better as bad??
And what do you mean “non-effort”? What were they supposed to do, drag out a gas grill? Since all of Astoria was out of power, I would imagine they were too!
And if you had bothered listening to the broadcast this morning, you would have heard that they are also donating large sums to the area food banks and other agencies…something like $25 Thousand total if I recall. I don’t call that “non-effort”.
3 On Dec 20, 05:14 pm, walter richards wrote:
McGee – tell the truth. You’d be upset no matter what they did.
If they had helped during the storm, you’d be accusing them of trying to buy their way into the community.
4 On Dec 20, 06:59 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Thank you Walter – all the way home tonight I was trying to figure out WHY he does this and came to the same conclusion – that no matter what they did, he’d find a reason to bash them.
5 On Dec 20, 08:25 pm, THartill wrote:
What happened?
How about a short overview for those of us that were not listening this morning….
6 On Dec 20, 10:18 pm, Programmer wrote:
I’m going to write a McGoo filter plugin for Firefox.
Anything written by the too-tight-pony-tail-wearing-dirty-tree-hugging-hippie-bastard will be blanked out and replaced with “blah blah port! yadda-yadda tourists! blah blah LNG! yippie yippie Marquis! blah blah SPELLING!”
That should keep the flavor, and cut down on my headaches. (His brand of logic (fanaticism) has been known to cause stokes in sane people.)
Anyone else want in?
7 On Dec 21, 04:17 am, Jon Dana wrote:
Patrick your getting confused in your old age. That last paragraph, the one with your paraphrase in it. Pulitzer didn’t say that, that was a Forrestor quote.
8 On Dec 21, 06:15 pm, MissBlue wrote:
Tryan – since you missed it I’ll give the short version:
Yesterday on 103.9, from 9:00 until just after 1:00, the whole show was devoted to people calling in with “wishes”. Every hour the staff would evaluate the calls and pick the wishes they could grant. The people were wishing for themselves or their spouse, a neighbor, grandkids, etc….and it was SO touching! Stephanie & Sonja did a great job, and there were many times that it got quite emotional, I’m not sure HOW they kept it together.
I was only able to listen while in my car for about an hour, and I called in, saying that I just really wanted to be able to get my grandchildren new coats. I didn’t know until today that my wish had been granted, and I was able to stop at Bradwood Landing’s office to pick it up gift cards this afternoon. I was so moved I was practically in tears, knowing that now that I can make my grandchildren’s Christmas happy. I should even be able to get them a few toys for under the tree!
The whole thing was made possible by Bradwood Landing – Stephanie said that Bradwood Landing called them, asking if the station would help them help others, and the station was thrilled to be involved.
When I was at their office, I asked how many wishes they’d been able to grant – and the nice lady there said about FORTY! Forty people get to have Christmas when they might not have…I think that’s pretty special.
Shame on you SCROOGE MCGEE – you really do let your personal opinions get in the way of any compassion you may possess. You may think that they are just “buying the people off”, but I, nor anyone I’ve talked to about this thinks anything of the sort.
9 On Dec 21, 08:01 pm, Lewis & Clakrk Carrolyn Kennedy wrote:
Shame on you SCROOGE MCGEE – you really do let your personal opinions get in the way of any compassion you may possess
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
Of course, those of us that are big, ahem “McGee Supporters” have made copies of this and wont hesitate to give it new life when and if the Great McGee makes another attempt for local public office around here.
“Attention Voters!
Have you read about how Ebeneezer McGee groused about how other people chose to spend their money for Christmas presents for neighbors of your’s who are less fortunate that many of our citizens?”
10 On Dec 21, 08:17 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Yeah LCCK, he’ll be on MY list too, as the one NOT to vote into ANY OFFICE WHATSOEVER.
Congrats MissBlue, I hope your grandkids enjoy their gifts :)
I know several people that were included in that radio promotion yesterday…and the people that I know would NOT have been able to have Christmas without some help. I’m happy that the people at Bradwood Landing thought of this, it was a great idea!
11 On Dec 21, 08:49 pm, Lewis & Clark Carrolyn Kennedy wrote:
Yeah LCCK, he’ll be on MY list too, as the one NOT to vote into ANY OFFICE WHATSOEVER.
————————————————————————————————————————————
Yeah, isnt the internet message board thing great? Whenever Citizen McGee gets a snootfull and then goes world wide web batshit off via one of his rants, we save them for posterity!!
During future candidate fourms wont it be fun to confront the Great Man with, “According to a quote you made, Mr. McGee, you wrote on Dec. 21 2007…...”
12 On Dec 21, 09:15 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:
And you have a well-deserved Merry Christmas MissBlue with your granted wish from Northern Star Natural Gas.
Too bad so many more that suffered the devastation and loss caused by the events of our recent past cannot share in your good fortune this Christmas.
It would have been very nice if Northern Star Natural Gas, if I were wishing, could have used their presumed funds to see to it that many families that will not have the opportunity to, have a welcomed Christmas Dinner and extra food this year due to parents not being able to work and maybe not having access to recovery resources at the moment.
I would imagine the local Food Banks or any other community recovery non-profit would not refuse any good fortune this Energy Speculator, Northern Star Natural Gas/Bradwood Landing L.L.C. would shower on them to help many hundreds. Can you imagine how many millions of dollars they have already invested to the negative in that project?
Yes I do have a personal opinion and with the resources NSNG has made it clear they have in their advertising budget with this clearly obvious P.R. event, they certainly could, in my opinion only, have made Christmas better for many, many more deserving citizens than forty or so and without pleading to get it.
I have been touring as much of the county as I could the last couple of days and I can hardly believe the damage caused to so many people, their property, our forests, a sad Christmas for so many, it saddens me deeply, the depth of the damage. It’s for real, vast, and cannot be over-reported.
Once again, a very Merry Christmas to you and yours MissBlue.
13 On Dec 21, 09:38 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
How dare you Patrick! Many people will be able to enjoy a better Christmas who caught the radio program and called in. And as far as the rest:
“It would have been very nice if Northern Star Natural Gas, if I were wishing, could have used their presumed funds to see to it that many families that will not have the opportunity to, have a welcomed Christmas Dinner and extra food this year due to parents not being able to work and maybe not having access to recovery resources at the moment.”
YOU HAVEN’T BEEN PAYING ATTENTION MCGEE!!!!!!!!!
It is well known that Bradwood Landing, aka, Northern Star Natural Gas, is giving THOUSANDS of dollars to local food banks to help those in need this season.
You are not doing well to try and make yourself look good here by implying it’s blood money. Give it up dude, and just don’t post for awhile…gee, might work for you!
YOU are the minority Patrick, whether you think so or not.
14 On Dec 21, 09:51 pm, MissBlues wrote:
Mr McGee – I am amazed at your audacity
I am one of only about 40 families (I think) that are being helped by this companies generosity. They didn’t HAVE to do this…they could have just contributed to the food banks, which they are anyway…with thousands of dollars
But no, they wanted to make sure regular people got helped too!
Considering they’re contributing more than many of us make in an entire year, YOU have absolutely NO argument here. Give it up!
15 On Dec 21, 10:07 pm, Oh Boy wrote:
I haven’t gotten into the public forums much until now…when a friend pointed me this way.
I’ve been watching all along however, and I’ve always thought Patrick McGee was really “out there”
Now I know for sure he is…Mr. McGee you’re an ass. You obviously have no idea how much NorthernStar is committed to this area.
It is upwards of TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS for storm relief you idiot. Gee, most people around here don’t make that much money in a YEAR!
Part for the radio promo, most for the food banks. You’d better be retreating with your tail between your legs and just SHUTTING UP for awhile. I’m thinkin’ that would be best.
16 On Dec 21, 10:24 pm, JoAnn wrote:
I am another of those people that was helped this week by Bradwood Landing with a wish.
I am so thankful to them for helping me make a Christmas for my children.
And Mr. McGee, I am SO offended by your bashing of them!
If not for the opportunity to call and make a wish, I may not have been able to give my kids any Christmas at all…their help made a huge differene!
I’m with the one that calls you SCROOGE MCGEE! Whoever you are!!
17 On Dec 21, 10:48 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
I was away for awhile tonight. and when I came back and saw the postings I literally applauded…with glee!
Thank YOU MissBlues (again), Oh Boy and JoAnn!
I am so happy that you and yours were helped to have a good Christmas.
It’s really sad that people like Patrick McGee here cannot understand how much it means….Just how much it means
Patrick! It means Christmas or NO Christmas…get it?
18 On Dec 22, 06:33 am, pamela wrote:
Hey, Mister McGoo has had a hard year of bashing, you guys. You have to give him credit for sticking his neck out and opening his mouth most every day on one forum or another though.
Hey…...Maybe someone could print up some flyers inviting people to send him christmas cards and place them at local businesses for him too. Wouldn’t that be great for McGee to open up his mailbox and see it “crazy full” of cards from well-wishers?
19 On Dec 22, 08:44 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
I was wondering how you guys can afford a computer and internet access, but cannot afford a few widgets for some kids for Christmas, must other people have to supply your other wants and needs. It is human nature to take freebees, I would have made a wish also, not because my children would be put out for Christmas, no , because I want my greedy little hands on anything I cannot afford for myself. Of course LNG is trying to buy peoples support, I really do not have a problem with that, if they want to spread alittle wealth around, they have every right. But Im going to tell you something, do not ever depend on that every year, it might come and bite us in the ass someday. LNG is going to start thinking they can buy off our people with a few widgets and hoody sweatshirts, thats pretty cheap pandering to them. Next year manage your money alittle better, buy things with your own hard earned money I just do not want the people to start depending on another big brother, Im not bashing anybody, just be poised.
20 On Dec 22, 05:53 pm, Country Boy wrote:
This was all done after they got their go ahead from the wonderful brave commissioners. This was no sell out because the majority of Clatsop County supports Bradwood Landing McGee did you grant any one a wish or even provide any family a meal? Did you donate to the food bank? Are you scared that some people will be able to earn a better living when Bradwood Landing becomes a reality?
Why don’t you join in supporting the majority and support Bradwood Landing (per the only Daily Asstorian poll)
The are supporting this community
21 On Dec 22, 06:13 pm, Emil Nyberg wrote:
Good post Country Boy.
It sure would be great if we could ever see Patrick do a positive post instead of always trying to make some one, some company, or some governing body look bad. Patrick, do you thrive on the theroy that if you can make others look bad it makes you look good? (It dose not).
Bradwood Landing, I want to thank you for buying 50 Christmas trees without a bunch of publicity to give free of charge to any one that could not afford it.
22 On Dec 22, 08:21 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Very good point Emil – I had heard they donated trees, but didn’t catch how many. I know if I lived paycheck-to-paycheck like many people do around here, the purchase of a tree might have been tough.
And to KY who said “I was wondering how you guys can afford a computer and internet access, but cannot afford a few widgets for some kids for Christmas, must other people have to supply your other wants and needs.” KY is a good name cause you’re an ass as well….SO many people around here DO live paycheck to paycheck, and when a whole bunch of them are probably out at LEAST a weeks pay for this month, what do you think that did to their Christmas Plans? “Hmmmm, do I buy food or get the kids a couple of toys?”
I’m sure that even the people who didn’t participate in the radio promotion, or get a free tree, will be having the best Christmas they can make under the circumstances. I just hope that everyone that needs it is taking advantage of the food banks!
23 On Dec 22, 08:52 pm, The Ghost Of Christmas Future wrote:
It’s Not Too Late, McGee…. It’s not too late, McGeeeeee…It’s not too late McGeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
24 On Dec 22, 09:40 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:
Good post Country Boy.
“It sure would be great if we could ever see Patrick do a positive post instead of always trying to make some one, some company, or some governing body look bad. Patrick, do you thrive on the theroy that if you can make others look bad it makes you look good? (It dose not).
Bradwood Landing, I want to thank you for buying 50 Christmas trees without a bunch of publicity to give free of charge to any one that could not afford it.”
You know what Emil, Northern Star Natural Gas can buy all the air time they wish and without my permission mind you, and they can also choose to spend their money, to their benefit, in any way they wish, to whatever end and if this is what suits them, so be it. 90 people in this community have benefitted from it and hopefully will have a better Christmas because of it.
I hope all the others that have been hit hard by the events of the last few weeks, will be showered with Christmas blessings as well.
25 On Dec 22, 10:28 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Patrick…they didn’t BUY the airtime on Thursday…NNB donated that time…because the knew that Bradwood was doing a good thing.
Can you ever just step back and accept that someone is doing something for a GOOD reason? You are so shallow Mcgee!
And whatever money NorthernStar had to spend for this promotion, for granting those wishes, was money well spent…to help people!. I commend them for helping some people have a happy Christmas when they might not have otherwise.
And I’m sure some of the many people that were affected by the storm will also be helped by the thousands of dollars they donated to the food banks.
Oh…I’ve been meaning to ask Patrick..What did YOU do to help?
26 On Dec 23, 08:20 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
Well AnotherAssholian, I lost half my fucking roof,even got some water damage BOO fucking HOO for me, I managed okay, why, because I manage my money. Most people who live pay check to pay check need to figure out what wants and needs are, people do not need Cable TV or Satellite TV, a 50” big screen, they do not need a 2007 F-350 with a 6” lift and 35”tires,or a computer with the latest high speed internet service ,ECT…......People need to start living within there means..
What the hell did you do during the storm and after Mr. AssHolian. did you spend it cutting trees off houses and clearing off roads with no sleep,,because our local fire department and road crews could not get it all, did you do that for free, because you cared about the people in the community, I bet you did no such thing. I started out not bashing anyone, but you Mr. AssHolian deserve a good probing without the KY, spread it out wide, c-mon you can take it!!! who’s your daddy!!!27 On Dec 23, 09:53 am, Patrick McGee wrote:
From AnotherAstorian: Patrick…they didn’t BUY the airtime on Thursday…NNB donated that time…because the knew that Bradwood was doing a good thing.
So you are calling Carol Newman, who confronted Paul Mitchell over the air, after initially being cut-off by Tom Freel becuase her wish was “No LNG in our community”, who admitted(Mitchell) that they, Northern Star Natural Gas/BLLNG, did indeed buy the airtime, a liar?
So, you know for sure NSNG/BLLNG didn’t buy the airtime? Who the hell are you then to accuse an upstanding and honorable community member of being a liar?
28 On Dec 23, 11:39 am, Patrick McGee wrote:
Oh, and what did I do during the storm?
Like many of us, not enough and I’ll always feel bad for not being able to do more.
29 On Dec 23, 01:41 pm, Alfred Einstien wrote:
Is this KY person McGoo’s wife?
30 On Dec 23, 04:04 pm, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
Sure Al, originality was never one of your strong points, you dipshit!
31 On Dec 23, 08:22 pm, thought police wrote:
KY, you really need to reign it in a notch or two. Everybody else who uses this forum anonymously does so without using sexual themed gutter language to make their points. If I was the moderator or site owner here I would’ve given you one warning then banned your ignorant garbage on the next offense. Clean it up or stick to your yahoo chatrooms if you get your kicks using that kind of languuage. You stink this place up we arent going to tolerate much more of it.
32 On Dec 23, 11:10 pm, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
Well if everybody else uses there right to free speech to thrash on me, I should have every right to defend myself against you “Suto-intellectuals” You may not like what I say and I sure do not like what you say..”AnotherAstorian” wrote; “KY is a good name cause you’re an ass as well….” This person attacked me using vulger language over an opinion I shared that had no vulgarity in it. I attacked back, now Im an outcast, I do not think so. I cannot be offended but you can, because you say so, who do you think you are the thought police? OH yeah, you are. Learn how to work kid!
33 On Dec 24, 02:44 am, Thought Police wrote:
Now, let me tell you something, Mr. Big Shot.
Quit whining and quit acting like a baby. Your continuous and gratutious crude sexual inuendo betray you as an ignorant and uncouth creep with an ego problem /superiority complex. How dare you banter about terms like “right to free speech” to justify your filthy remarks. This aint the US Government here, this is a private site and you are a guest here-just like you were in a private home-in short, you dont have any rights at all. If you are a responsible semi-civilized adult you shouldn’t have to be told how to behave. So, quit embarrassing yourself and quit trying to reduce this fine cyber asset to our local community to your gutter level. Either grow up and conduct yourself like a gentleman or get out.
It’s amazing to me that Mr. Hartill hasnt shown you the door yet, but we will petition him to do exactly that if we dont see some improvement in your language. You’re bad for business, kid, and we’ll give you the bum’s rush if you dont straighten up and fly right.
Do I make myself clear?
34 On Dec 24, 03:22 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
I was trying to conduct myself in a very respectful manner, but seeing that tolerance is not one of your strong points there is no reason to continue to defend myself against such intolerance. If you must, keep making yourself look foolish as I stand by laughing
35 On Dec 24, 03:32 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
And let me add; Why is it, that the loudest voices for tolerance, happen to be the most intolerant people?
36 On Dec 24, 03:50 am, Thought Police wrote:
this is what you call conducting yourself in “a very respectful manner”? Even your ridiculous sig is trash! the following is just from this thread. God knows you’ve polluted other threads here
“I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped…I lost half my fucking roof..Mr. AssHolian deserve a good probing without the KY, spread it out wide, c-mon you can take it!!! ”
You are really out of your tree, do you really think you’re fooling anyone when you deny you’re being blatantly offensive? You are a goddamned idiot.
37 On Dec 24, 05:40 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
Blah, Blah, Blah “God knows you’ve polluted other threads here” “You are a goddamned idiot.” And Im the offensive sinner. You have now reduced yourself way below my level on this one. Nobody can defend themselves against useless accusations, so why keep trying. Thanks for setting me straight, you are a much better person than I. Now how can I come to terms with you?
38 On Dec 24, 02:16 pm, Thought Police wrote:
Congratulations, for other than your contentious sig, you’ve completed a post here without spewing filth. Keep it that way. Lose the sig, come up with a new one, and stay in the discussions here because everybody should have a seat at the table and a chance to speak. You and me are cool and terms have been met, thank.
39 On Dec 24, 06:58 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
For your information Mr KY…I spent the entire week helping my neighbors clean up their downed trees – and helping my son do an emergency patch job on his own roof and flooded basement.
Most people I know who live paycheck-to-paycheck DO live within their means, there’s just not much left over after the necessities are taken care of, so unless planned far in advance, being shorted 1+ weeks pay is devastating.
And Patrick – Yes, thank you, I’ll call Carol Newman a blatant liar – and I do not consider her a fine upstanding member of our community, I’ve always thought she was just WAY too out there. The fact that she would call in to a radio program where people were being granted wishes, for the mere opportunity to bash the people sponsoring those wishes, shows what a freaking nut she is.
And Thought Police, thank you for your input – Apparently I encited KY and I apologize for the filth that spewed forth after that…although I’m of the school that ass isn’t a bad word, when justified. It IS in the dictionary after all ;-)
40 On Dec 24, 07:08 pm, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
Well as long as we are all cool thats for the better Thanks
41 On Dec 24, 07:53 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
We’re all cool – Hey, if we didn’t have anything to disagree about, there would be no need for these discussion boards right? Everyone has a right to their opinions, that’s why its so great to live in America where opinions are allowed. Merry Christmas everyone! (even you Patrick!)
42 On Dec 24, 09:31 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:
My best wishes and happiest holidays to all of you and may you all prosper in the coming New Year.
43 On Dec 24, 10:39 pm, Zebaneezer McBeanfield wrote:
Patrick – Yes, thank you, I’ll call Carol Newman a blatant liar – and I do not consider her a fine upstanding member of our community, I’ve always thought she was just WAY too out there. The fact that she would call in to a radio program where people were being granted wishes, for the mere opportunity to bash the people sponsoring those wishes, shows what a freaking nut she is.
______________________________________________________________________
Is this Carol Newman that kooky old hippy woman from New York City who has a place in Brownsmead? She’s another one of those outsiders with too much money trying to tell us locals what’s good for the people of the county
44 On Dec 25, 09:24 am, Patrick McGee wrote:
Is this Carol Newman that kooky old hippy woman from New York City who has a place in Brownsmead? She’s another one of those outsiders with too much money trying to tell us locals what’s good for the people of the county
Kooky?
Hippy?
Outsider?
Carol Newman?
Board of Directors – KMUN Radio
Lives the way she does by choice, not necessity.
Community Activist.
More balls that any spineless anonym on many community issues and not afraid to stand up and be accountable.
That Carol Newman, yes.
45 On Dec 25, 11:48 am, Zebeneezer McBeanfield wrote:
Board of Directors – KMUN Radio
Wow! Now, there’s a prestigious position of great importance-bet that pays six figures a year too. Speaking of jobs, has she ever worked a day in her life? Or is being a trust fund baby and being on the KMUN board of directors regarded as work? She doesnt represent anyone in this area but the lazy rich.
46 On Dec 25, 12:29 pm, Trillium wrote:
More balls that any spineless anonym on many community issues and not afraid to stand up and be accountable.
____________________________________________________
Mcgee goes for the jugular using his tried and true “My Dog’s Balls Are Bigger Than Your Dog’s” gambit.
Me thinks this Newman woman and Citizen McGee might’ve shared a few bongloads in the past.
47 On Dec 27, 10:44 pm, Californication wrote:
It’s amusing reading the comments of people getting googly-eyed over the wholly-owned corporate subsidiary (registered as a Delaware corporation) of a mutli-billion dollar Texas corporation giving away something like $30,000 (probably less, but I don’t know the current price of Xmas trees bought in bulk). That’s probably less than one week’s income for one of the battery of lawyers who’s using that KY to lubricate you while you’re bent over to pick up your trinkets.
You folks really are going to get screwed from behind, but from the looks of it you’re going to enjoy it. I can’t say I’ve ever seen a community so eager to have their environment, way of life and their very souls ruined for the sake of a few dollars—and to supply California with natural gas.
48 On Dec 28, 01:00 am, Emil Nyberg wrote:
Why not close PDX to keep those darn Califorians out and close I-5 near the south border of Oregon to keep those darn Califorians from getting our wine? I know we do not need their fruit and veges.
49 On Dec 28, 03:48 am, Californication wrote:
You’re missing the point. California, by their own admission, doesn’t need natural gas—they have enough to meet their needs for the foreseeable future. Do some research.
Why should Oregonians have their environment trampled for a commodity that’s not needed? Why aren’t these facilities being built in California where the bulk of any future need (if there ever is any) will be? Why don’t they put one of these facilities in San Francisco Bay and let the tankers pass through the Golden Gate? Or put one in Long Beach to supply Los Angeles—hell, it’s already one of the world’s largest ports they probably wouldn’t even notice it was there. I’ll tell you why—they have Oregon willing to do the dirty work for them. Why should California despoil their countryside when the good citizens of Oregon don’t have a backbone and will let them run potentially explosive pipelines through their wilderness?
And then what does Oregon get aside from the environmental destruction? A few tax dollars and some jobs which will most likely be filled by people coming from outside the area because the locals likely don’t have the skills to do them.
Yeah, bend over Oregon and enjoy the ride.
50 On Dec 28, 08:47 am, Jon Dana wrote:
Come on Guy you can do better than that.
51 On Dec 28, 02:21 pm, Californication wrote:
Guy?
52 On Dec 28, 10:14 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Californication…has it ever occurred to you that if more electricity is generated from natural gas, it may make the coal-fired plants, which is where we get most of our electricity, obsolete? If we used natural gas instead of coal, it would make a huge difference in greenhouse gas emissions. Yes, wind power would be wonderful, but I don’t wish to see all of myh hillsides full of wind turbines! Natural gas IS the least harmful of the fuels produced by our planet, for our planet.
And have you been paying NO attention at all to the facts stating that the gas delivered here, at least to the Bradwood facility, is destined for Oregon and Washington FIRST? Yes, NW Natural saw an opportunity to supply a southern pipeline as well, but the majority of the gas will be for US. I refuse to buy into the rhetoric offered by Columbia Riverkeepers and the like that continue to spout that all of the LNG coming into the Pacific NW is going to California – that is utter bull-crap…and anyone that believes their idiocy hasn’t done their homework.
Now on the other hand, I have absolutely NO faith in the one they are trying for in Warrenton – Oregon LNG, formerly Calpine. THAT gas IS going to California, and I cannot believe they’re even trying to get that one approved…what a horrible location!
53 On Dec 28, 10:30 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Oh…and another thing that’s been really been bugging me lately…
The scuttlebut is that the electric car is back…which is a wonderful thing, and when it’s affordable I’ll probably be one of the first to get one because it’s great! I don’t have to drive more than 30 miles a day so it’s perfect! A few years ago I saw the movie “Who Killed the Electric Car” and it pissed me off to no end….that we could have HAD electric cars that long ago if it weren’t for the auto industry caving in to the oil industry!
How much in auto emissions could have been saved over those years? It’s incomprehensible! In any case, my point is…
The electric car is a wonderful thing…but something still has to charge those batteries, electricity. Electricity generated from natural gas rather from coal plants is much more appealing to me. And yes, for those who will jump in with wind or wave power, great, but those sources of energy are still years from being developed for all of us to use.
54 On Dec 29, 02:00 am, Californication wrote:
I like facts. The population of the entire State of Oregon is 3.7 million and not pojected to reach 4 million until 2012. Los Angeles County—9.9 million. California—46.4 million.
The proposed pipeline from Bradwood will go to Madras, which is just north of Redmond and Bend and east of the Cascades, and that pipeline leads directly to California:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngpipeline/western.html
If they were planning to supply the greater population of Oregon one presumes they would want to tie into the nearer pipeline which they could do near or south of Portland, not on the other side of the Cascades.
You might want to check your sources on electrical generation in Oregon, as more than half the state’s electricity comes from hydroelectric sources, not coal generation. Natural gas already accounts for about 1/3 and coal makes up most of the rest, primarily from one plant.
Here are the numbers (2006):
Hydroelectric: 1,874 thousand MWh
Natural gas: 1,354 thousand MWh
Coal: 411 thousand MWh
Renewables (other than hydroelectric): 190 thousand MWh
As I said before, the LNG is going to supply California, not Oregon as it isn’t needed in the foreseeable future.
Electric cars sound great. I look forward to the day the batteries become efficient enough to make sense. The Chevy Volt will have a gasoline engine which will kick in if the battery needs charging, which it will if a trip is longer than about 40 miles, so despite the engine being electric powered it will still only get 60 mpg with the battery charging taken into account on longer trips. There’s hope in something new, however: http://www.physorg.com/news117212815.html
Some day, maybe.
55 On Dec 29, 07:36 am, I need some KY Im tired of being dry humped wrote:
What about Nuclear Power, thats a clean source of energy, almost 30% of Finlands power comes from Nuclear power with great success. Finlands population is about 5 million. As for the battery power, your just trading one pollution for another. I will stick to the Internal Combustion Engine, for now.
56 On Dec 29, 02:43 pm, Jon Dana wrote:
Those dams are an ecological disaster and should be removed from the Columbia. replaced by gas-fired plants ran by a Oregon pud then we could charge more to calf. for elec. and give ourselves a break. Ya I know I’m dreaming
57 On Dec 29, 03:04 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Californication – the primary pipeline from the Bradwood project connects to the Williams pipeline in Washington. IF the Palomar pipeline is constructed, it will simply be a second line.
58 On Dec 29, 06:16 pm, Californication wrote:
Yes, it would be a second line—a 36” line to serve California, not the NW. The line into Washington is only 30”. Bigger pipe = primary pipe. The larger line would be the primary line, despite what Northern Star would like you to believe. If Bradwood isn’t built neither pipeline will be built. If Bradwood is built both pipelines will likely be built. If their primary purpose is to supply the NW with gas, why would they need a larger pipeline leading to California?
Like Governor Kulongoski, I’d like to see the justification for adding LNG facilities in the area. So far I haven’t seen any.
59 On Dec 29, 08:19 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:
Northwest Natural came to the table with the Palomar proposal, wasn’t it?
Don’t forget Oregon LNG/Pipeline plans to tap into that same Palomar line down around Timber along with Northwest’s line into in from Mist.
Once the precedent is set with one of these projects, the others will come right behind them.
Did anybody actually think that all these players are not working together on this perpetration?
60 On Dec 29, 08:25 pm, Patrick McGee wrote:
Oh! And The Justification?
A Billion cubic feet of vaporized Natural Gas per day at, say, a wholesale price of $0.0047 per cubic foot?
$4,700,000.00 per day, per site?
61 On Dec 29, 10:54 pm, AnotherAstorian wrote:
Oh I would love to see a needs study done…it would show that by 2015 this region’s gas supply will pretty much go bye-bye…
I don’t give a rats ass about Oregon LNG – they have no credibility in my book, because their pipeline isn’t going to serve any of us here. Has anyone ever considered the thought that if Bradwood gets the go-ahead that maybe the Oregon LNG will be dead in the water? Gee! What a concept! If a needs study WAS done, I bet it would show that there’s no need for TWO…and I would certainly rather see it in a more remote area than Warrenton!
Also, between the two companies involved, I would sincerely like to see Bradwood get built, because after researching the companies I have alot more faith in their knowledge of the industry.
And Californication…the pipeline is 30” on the Washington side yes. Only because it begins as a 36” pipe at Bradwood and has users along the way, like Wauna Mill and the Beaver plant, resulting in the need for only 30” once it crosses the river.
62 On Dec 30, 10:13 am, Patrick McGee wrote:
The pipeline crossing the river to the Williams pipeline is essentially dead at the moment with Bradwood and Oregon LNGfocussing on “The Palomar Pipeline” proposal, at least to my understanding.
Once again “AA”, both companies will junction at Timber along with Northwest Natural Gas’s Spur line from Mist.

63 On Dec 30, 04:18 pm, Californication wrote:
Here’s the rest of the Palomar Line on it’s way to California.
Previous Article:
« Port Of Astoria Still Floundering In Its Own Sewage Of Dysfunction?
Next Article:
Deer is fed up! »
1 On Dec 20, 02:00 pm, The Guy Who Writes This wrote:
That goes for Blogs as well. ; )