You are viewing the archives of the old northcoastoregon.com. Please visit the new North Coast Oregon at: http://www.northcoastoregon.com/

Presidents Day Open Thread

by Tryan Hartill

Who was the best President and who was the worst President of all time?

Note…Since W. Bush and Willie Clinton will be the obvious answer for most everyone here, how about we go the best and worst from 1992 and previous. And maybe a short bit on why they sucked or why they were so damn good.

Click stars to rate this article. This article hasn't been rated yet.

11 comments on this article (post your own)

1 On Feb 19, 08:33 pm, Mom of Three wrote:

Well, shoot. Because the one we have now has run us into a ditch that I am not sure we can ever get out of.

I don’t remember THAT many presidents, but I have to say I admire Jimmy Carter to this day. I don’t think he was cutthroat enough or lied enough to be an effective leader of that pack of wolves. But I admire him as a human being and he is very wise when it comes to foreign policy.

History has shown that Lincoln, Truman and FDR remain the most admired and, of course, George Washington. The deeds of these men are well-known, so I’d have to concur.

James Buchanan’s presidency was seen as pretty awful, considering that, though he morally opposed slavery, he also believed that the Constitution supported the continuation of slavery in states where it existed. By the time Lincoln took over, the South was on its way to succession, and Fort Sumter would erupt soon. Franklin Pierce saw his presidency also suffered from trying to juggle the slavery issue.

2 On Feb 19, 10:27 pm, THartill wrote:

Like you I find it hard to pick the best or the worst. Most did many great things that I agree with and then turned around and did things where I want to say “Wa?”

Washington and Jefferson are probably the 2 that I dislike the least. Washington really could have taken advantage being the first up. I agree with Jefferson the most politically out of any President, but he was very hypocritical on the slavery issue. He spoke openly about freeing slaves and even introduced bills in Congress, but “owned them” his whole life.

Worst is a whole line-up. Wilson started many bone-head programs and policies like the Fed Reserve, Income Tax and Farm Subsidies. Also was a big KKK supporter and his handling of Post WW1 was suspect. LBJ spent a crapload of money on many programs and then had to Tax the hell out of everyone to keep the Country afloat. Nixon looked bad on the surface, but if you compare his actions to more recent White House Critters you ask “He was impeached for that??”.

Reagan has to be the most over-rated. He is below average in my opinion, but is a God to Republicans because he talked so much smack about “The Left” while he was President.

3 On Feb 20, 07:01 am, Walter Richards wrote:

I don’t think you can judge it in terms of scandals. Almost every Presidency had it’s own scandals, that may seem small to us but were big to their time. I think you have to judge them on the basis of how they affected where the gov’t stands within the Constitution.

Washington was the best, by far. He, IIRC, was the one that convinced the rest of the Founders not to have a “President for life”. And he was the first politician to step down after a self-imposed term limit.

Lincoln was the worst, as he destroyed the Republic and gave us a Union. (And he didn’t care a whit about the slavery issue, per his own words.)

FDR, who gave us the socialist welfare state, is a close second to Lincoln. He enslaved the entire country in the name of “compassion”, basically.

4 On Feb 21, 12:42 am, Mom of Three wrote:

I’ve had that same thought about Nixon lately. He was brilliant with his foreign policy, and compared to what these guys have done, it seems tame, though I understand it was not. The bar has just been lowered so far since then, sadly.

5 On Feb 21, 06:35 am, Auntie L wrote:

I am with MO3 – Love Jimmy C. A marshmallow with a heart, who had a real family,... he didn’t lie, was good with the foreign relations and he has actually done other stuff after his ‘presidential life’ that we should all strive for – helping others less fortunate than ourselves. Or giving in any way!

TH, I know you told us not to, but I have to. Wasn’t a fan of “Shrub the Elder” and …...just when you didn’t think it was possible, (the saying goes about the apple (or the turd as my daddy always said) not falling far from the tree.) “Son of Shrub” has been our worst nightmare.

6 On Feb 21, 06:56 am, Walter Richards wrote:

I gotta say, the hilarious thing to me … is that Presidents get blamed/credited for stuff they have little (if any) control over. Like taxes and the economy.

Sure, a President can endorse a tax cut/increase … but it’s up to Congress whether or not to actually do it. And “The Fed” (eral Reserve) has more control over the economy than any branch of gov’t, yet the People put up with it’s unConstitutional existance.

7 On Feb 21, 09:58 am, Pierce wrote:

True enough Jimmy Carter was not to blame for the misery index and he provided leadership in a time of energy crisis. He is a great negotiator and spelendid example of what an American President is. Too many it seems are hung up on the “Comander and Chief” thing.

8 On Feb 22, 12:08 pm, Walter Richards wrote:

Carter’s downfall was the Iranian hostage crisis. It was, really, an act of war and his response was lacking. If it hadn’t been for that, a lot of the “swing vote” would have gone his way (IMO).

I think the only way you’ll get an unbiased judgement of Presidents is by someone who wasn’t directly affected at the time. IE; someone who wasn’t even born for at least 10 years after the person in question dies, and can look at the “big picture”.

9 On Feb 22, 05:28 pm, Pierce wrote:

Gotta part company with you on at least part of this post Walter. There are a passel of toads out there constantly attempting to rewrite history. Too often they get away with it. The Iranian hostage deal is a perfect example. Sure it was investigated, but its all just smoke and mirrors. Count me among those who who are highly skeptical of the CIA and erstwhile director George H W Bush’s role in that sordid affair. Others may need to wait at least 10 years after his death to determine the big picture on him and W too but it’s been crystal clear for me and many others for a long time.

10 On Feb 22, 05:41 pm, THartill wrote:

I think the only way you’ll get an unbiased judgement of Presidents is by someone who wasn’t directly affected at the time.

The only trouble is, if someone was born after the Presidency in question, they are relying on people that were actually affected at the time. How else would they get enough information to pass judgment without reading the words of people that were there?

11 On Feb 23, 07:54 am, Walter Richards wrote:

Partly right, Tryan. But they are more likely to read ALL sides, rather than just one – as people who were/are directly affected tend to do. And the farther out from the Presidency such looking takes, the more likely previously unavailable information (Presidential papers, “confidential” reports, etc) will be available. They can also better look at trended information (IE; economic figures) and get a more accurate picture, than someone just looking at the figures for that particular administration.

Post A Comment

(required)

(required but not displayed)



(No HTML, Textile only please. Live comment preview below.)

this is not Spam.

preview

:

Jan 6, 01:21 am


Previous Article:
« New Dredge Thread....Peter Huhtala's Comment

Next Article:
Kulongoski, Smokers, Democrats and Fuzzy Math »



NCO Reader Comments


lhjzgbnr txymgjc (The Vote 2006!)
lhjzgbnr txymgjc (The Vote 2006!)
lhjzgbnr txymgjc (The Vote 2006!)
SARA (What to do in Astoria on New Years Eve....)
Alexa Manning (What does the Federal Government Do with our Taxes?)
cnabas (New Tillamook and Clatsop County Blog)
pasgettaorri (The Vote 2006!)
pasgettaorri (The Vote 2006!)
connie (Focus on 49: BOCC work session grapples with difficult legislature)
Delores (Focus on 49: BOCC work session grapples with difficult legislature)
Kristen Molina (North Coast AA Round Up Seaside April 4th 5th 6th 2008)
Madonna Carr (What does the Federal Government Do with our Taxes?)
Wallace Kennedy (More D.A. Talk)
Ollie Woodward (Fort George Brewery Coming Alive)
Augustine Sweet (CCFOG - First report on Lee recall petition signatures)
Glynn Oconnor (A gun show ... without guns ?)
Lorne Riley (notes from Clean Slate PAC meeting 2/13/07)
Clare Ruiz (Durban Group Discusses Carbon Trading and LNG in Astoria)
Stewart Hernandez (Random News For Friday)
Johnna Acosta (Measure 50....Healthy Kids...Cigarette Taxes)

Recent Articles

View All Articles...

Feeds



Home | Archives | Contribute | Back to Top
Take What You Want 2009 NorthCoastOregon.com unless otherwise indicated.
Please email us with any questions or comments.
Site created by Upspring Design.